|
At first glance, Mouna presents a more traditional picture. Her husband, Hassan, a college graduate and part-time mechanic, is out in the field, so she invites the researchers to her house to sit and wait. Amidst the bits of machinery and spare parts, which clutter the compound, her two young children play. But as the researchers start talking with her, they learn that Mouna is also a graduate with a Diploma in Commerce, who came to El Bustan from Buheira--near El Bustan, but in the West Delta area of the Old Lands--in 1988. She has, on loan from the government, a two-hectare farm--as big as that of her husband (although now they are farming the two pieces of land together). Moreover, she knows all about the farm management, inputs, decisions, market process As well as being active farmers, the researchers have also been struck by the women's very active role in the research process, which has actually forced the researchers at some points to rethink their approach. "If you don't give me the information I'm asking for about my land, and if you aren't honest with me, how can you expect me to be honest with you?" Noura, the farmer from Bangar Sukur, asked researchers during her participation in one of the project workshops. The team of social and biophysical scientists had encouraged the participation of farmers such as Noura in the research, but where were the boundaries? It is widely accepted that farmers are in reality researchers themselves, constantly experimenting on their farms for the best results. But what would happen to the scientific aspects and controlled experiment nature of the monitoring exercise if the farmers began to act on the research findings and actually start to experiment with different resource management options, as intelligent and determined people like Noura are bound to do? Clearly, the more that farmers like Noura and Fatma participate in research, the less clear the distinction between farmers and researchers becomes. In Fatma's case, the issue was over the necessarily limited number of farmers who could be included as direct participants in research activities. The project had already used random sampling to select participants to answer the carefully prepared questionnaires. And yet, in the face of Fatma's fierce argument, they had to concede the point. According to the selection criteria, she was as suitable for inclusion, if not more suitable, than others. After further lengthy discussion, the project team agreed to include Fatma as a participant. Farmer participation in agricultural research is often a case of farmers selecting themselves as participants, rather than researchers being allowed to select farmer participants on predetermined scientific, objective criteria. These are some of the problematic situations that arise when researchers truly encourage farmer (male and female) participation in research. However, the benefits of such an approach are also apparent. Fatma, like other community members, saw the project as important and was motivated to be a part of it. The relationship between the researchers and the farmers is good, and the latter are keen to provide information and to assist in the researchers' work. The NVRSRP and the national program's research in Egypt's New Lands is a good example of the need to uncover women's often invisible contribution to agriculture. It also illustrates another factor in natural-resources management: If you encourage people, including women, to participate, they may actually start to define the research process. And that can only make the research more relevant.
Dr Moustafa Bedier is Socioeconomist in the Nile Valley and Red Sea Regional Program of ICARDA, based in Cairo.Dr Richard Tutwiler is Socioeconomist in the Farm Resources Management Program of ICARDA. Ms Christine Kalume is Science Writer/Editor, ICARDA.
|
|