![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Collecting
and Conserving Genetic
Resources to Meet Future Needs |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By
Jan Valkoun
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Water scarcity is one of the 21st Centurys major challenges. In the rainfed farming systems of semi-arid regions, drought stress is common and unpredictable. According to climate-change models, annual fluctuations in rainfall are likely to increase in most of Central and West Asia and North Africa (CWANA) in the coming decades. To counter this serious threat to agricultural production, ICARDA and the national agricultural research systems in CWANA focus much of their effort on breeding for improved drought tolerance and increased water-use efficiency. To be successful, they need a ready supply of genetic diversity from which to select needed traits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dryland agrobiodiversity
in West Asia gave the world such important crops as wheat and barley, a
number of pulses and fruit trees. This agrobiodiversity continues to sustain
the livelihood of local communities and provide useful genes for plant breeding
programs worldwide. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDAs
mandate cropsbarley, wheat, lentil, faba bean, chickpea, and forage
legumeswere domesticated in CWANA some 8,00010,000 years ago.
Over the millennia, they have developed, through selection by farmers,
various adaptive mechanisms for drought stress tolerance. Crop wild relatives
represent an even richer source of genes for stress tolerance and adaptation,
because they have been around much longer, and have survived periods of
very harsh climate, especially in the Pleistocene Era. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
landrace and wild relative populations are sampled and conserved in genebanks. The centers of Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) have some of the worlds most comprehensive collections of plant germplasm, which they hold in trust under the auspices of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The worlds genetic heritage held safely in trust Genetic resources collections
held at ICARDA total 129,000 accessions, 20% of the germplasm accessions
held in trust by the CGIAR centers, of which ICARDA is one. Two-thirds
of ICARDAs genebank accessions originated from countries of Central
and West Asia, North Africa and Mediterranean Europe, where a harsh and
stressful climate of pronounced seasonality with cold and rainy winters
and long hot and dry summers is typical. Within- and among-season weather
fluctuations are also unpredictable. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 1.
Crop wild relatives collected by ICARDA in dry sites.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table 2.
Crop landraces collected by ICARDA in dry sites.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Drought-hardy
wheat relative,part of collection
Several species of goatgrass such as Aegilops bicornis, Aegilops crassa, Aegilops kotschyi, Aegilops searsii, Aegilops vavilovii and Aegilops tauschii, prefer dry environments. At least half of these wild relatives of wheat were found in dry sites (Table 1). Ae. tauschii is of particular interest, since gene transfer from this drought-adapted species to bread wheat is relatively easy. Others are also of interest. A number of drought-adapted accessions were found in wild progenitors of wheat, barley and lentil, i.e., Triticum dicoccoides, Hordeum spontaneum and Lens orientalis, respectively, which cross easily with the cultivated species. Their chromosomes are similar and |
A view
of the ICARDA genebank. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
any wild genes
can be transferred through chromosome recombination in meiosis. In addition
to wild species, many landrace accessions have been collected from rainfed
sites with annual rainfall below 300 mm (Table 2). The significant proportion
of landraces (28%) originating from dry sites is a reflection of ICARDAs
focus on drought in its collection strategy. Making the most of modern information technologies Recent advances in information
technology, such as geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing
technology, have increased map resolutions to scales sufficient for detailed
climatic characterization of the geographical distribution of wild relatives
of wheat, barley, lentil and chickpea, and forage, pasture and rangeland
species in CWANA. The feasibility of such an approach was documented in
a recent ICARDA study, in which a total of 67 climatic and four soil variables
were generated for 391 collection sites in Syria, from which ICARDA genebank
accessions were collected and geographic coordinates were known. These
accessions represented 183 wild Triticum and 558 Aegilops populations
belonging to 4 and 16 species, respectively. The data were subsequently
subjected to different statistical analyses, and wheat wild relatives
adapted to specific stresses, including drought, were identified. The
use of geographic positioning systems (GPS) equipment on collection missions
has substantially increased the accuracy in determining collection site
location, which is a prerequisite for the GIS analyses. Genebank collections only a part of the story Ex situ gene bank collections
represent only fractions of the rich genetic diversity that has accumulated
for millennia in the natural populations and farmers fields and
orchards. Therefore, the ex situ effort has to be complemented
by conserving agrobiodiversity in situ, in the original habitat,
in partnership with those who manage and utilize itfarmers, herders
and their communities. Several projects in the CWANA region are testing
the in situ or on-farm approach to biodiversity conservation. The
Dryland Agrobiodiversity Project, funded by the Global Environment Facility
and the United Nations Development Programme, is working to conserve biodiversity
through promotion of its profitable utilization by farm families and communities.
The comprehensive project, which operates in Jordan, Lebanon, the Palestinian
Authority and Syria, is coordinated by ICARDA in collaboration with the
International Plant Genetic Resources Institute and the Arab Center for
the Studies of Arid Zones and Dry Lands. It is focused on the globally
important indigenous genepool of cereals and pulses, forage and pasture
legume wild species, and several fruit tree genera. The main task of the
project is to identify and test, in participation with local communities
and other stakeholders, sustainable options for in situ conservation
of the target germplasm. The ultimate aim is improved livelihoods through
sustainable utilization of the indigenous agrobiodiversity. Communities
are helped to profit from the plant heritage passed down from generations
of their ancestors, and in the process secure it for generations to come.
For unless people see a value in agrobiodiversity, it will be lost to
neglect, replaced by introduced species or pushed to extinction by habitat
change.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||