![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA's Research
Portfolio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| ICARDA's Research Portfolio> Project2.1>Project2.2>Project2.3>Project2.4>Project2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA's Research Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Theme 2.
Production Systems Management
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Project 2.2. Agronomic Management of Cropping Systems for Sustainable
Production
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
in
Dry Areas
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA has continued to address the key issues of fertilizer use, soil fertility, and soil degradation. The Center's partnership with the private sector representative IMPHOS has both considerably increased the knowledge base related to on-farm P use in WANA and provided a wide range of outputs, such as publications and conferences. Research into appropriate tillage systems has also continued, identifying and testing conservation tillage methods that conserve soil fertility, limit degradation, and benefit the environment by reducing erosion and encouraging carbon sequestration. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA's
partnership with the private Soil fertility constraints
and fertilizer use in the WANA region have been a major focus of ICARDA's
research since its inception. In the mid-1980s, such activities were
organized, in collaboration with the region's national programs, under
the umbrella of the Soil Test Calibration Network. Though the project
was mainly supported by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP),
financial assistance to some countries (Morocco, Turkey, Tunisia, Lebanon
and Syria) was provided by the World Phosphate Institute (IMPHOS), based
in Casablanca, Morocco. This initial support proved to be invaluable
for the national programs, especially in conducting on-farm trials. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conservation tillage as an alternative to conventional deep tillage in the cropping systems of CWANA Over the past few decades, CWANA's dryland farming systems have become more intensive. However, in many areas, arable lands are experiencing alarming rates of degradation, either due to inappropriate soil and crop management or the impact of drought and/or erosion. Tractor use has spread to much of the region in the last 40 years, and it is now common practice to plow to a depth of 20-30 cm every year, using a disc or moldboard plow-plows designed for use in more humid and |
|||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Conservation tillage practice in Central Asia, Kazakstan. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
temperate areas. Harrows
or tyned implements are also used to prepare the seedbed. Regional scientists
and farmers give various reasons for such deep plowing, including: the
need to break up the cultivated layer, increased water and soil conservation
(by preventing runoff), and weed control (through the deep burial of
weed seeds). |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Therefore, ICARDA has been investigating the potential for alternative 'conservation tillage' practices (i.e. 'minimum tillage' and 'no-till' systems) to increase the sustainability of arable farming in CWANA. No-till systems involve drilling seeds directly into the ground; minimum tillage involves shallow cultivation, using tyned implements which disrupt the soil to a depth of only 10 cm (once or twice before planting), or direct planting using a tyned implement combined with a drill box. Both practices minimize soil disturbance and ensure the presence of a residue cover-an important consideration in |
![]() No-till direct drill equipment for sustainable management of soil. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| WANA.
Conservation tillage, particularly no-till direct drilling, considerably
reduces C losses (relative to conventional tillage) by reducing C mineralization
rates, because the soil is less disturbed and experiences little or no
exposure to radiation. By contrast, in conventional deep tillage, moldboard
plows turn over the deeper soil layers, bring them to the surface, and
so expose a larger surface area to radiation. Indeed, five times more
C is lost to the atmosphere under conventional tillage than under no-till
practices. With careful management of the soil, as reported in the literature,
the potential sequestration of C per year may reach 0.1-0.2 Mg/ha for
irrigated cropland and 0.05-0.10 Mg/ha for both rainfed cropland and rangeland.
This has the potential to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Thus, ICARDA,
in collaboration with NARS, has conducted trials in six countries, to
compare conservation tillage with conventional tillage systems, within
the crop-rotation systems commonly used by farmers. Results of trials in southern Kazakstan showed that, at a depth of 0-30 cm, the SOM content of moderately washed-out soils fell from 1.37% to 1.30% in 10 years under conventional deep plowing. However, at the same depth in soil undergoing conservation tillage, SOM content remained the same, while conservation tillage, combined with NP fertilization and straw residue or manure application, increased SOM content to 1.5% during the same period. In Jordan, Morocco, Syria and Turkey, similar results have been obtained from trials in continuous cropping systems. In Syria in particular, the no-till system increased SOM content by about 0.5% in the top 10 cm of the soil. This has important implications, as high SOM levels lead to improved soil structure, increased water infiltration, and also increased soil water-holding capacity and water-use efficiency in crop production-valuable in the drought-prone areas of CWANA. Soils with higher SOM contents are also more fertile, having greater nutrient cycling and storage capacities, as well as greater biological activity and diversity. Thus, conservation tillage can both reduce the need for fertilizer inputs and increase farmers' yields sustainably; it can also reduce soil erosion. Conservation tillage is also more energy-efficient than conventional deep plowing systems, offering savings of up to 12-18 liters of gasoline/ha. This also reduces farmers' input costs and improves their productivity, and can result in lower consumer food costs if appropriate policies are implemented. From a practical point of view, the tools needed for the minimum tillage system are readily available to farmers in CWANA. However, for the no-till system, suitable drills would have to be manufactured locally. Further collaboration with NARS is planned with regard to no-till drill design and agronomic practices that can be used in conjunction with conservation tillage. To realize the potential of conservation tillage, further socioeconomic studies are planned to document how land users are adapting their production systems to changing conditions where access to, and availability of, inputs are restricted. These studies will include analysis of short- and long-term profitability, as well as of constraints to adoption and the effects of various sociological factors. ICARDA also plans to analyze current and future policy scenarios, in order to provide policy makers with the information necessary for policy development and implementation. In 2002, CIMMYT and ICARDA conducted a symposium on 'Conservation Agriculture' at the Annual Meeting of the Agronomy Society of America. ICARDA scientists presented their findings on conservation tillage and direct sowing, illustrating the potential of these systems to improve crop production while safeguarding the local and global environment. To further its aim of promoting conservation tillage in the CWANA region, in 2002 ICARDA also contributed to a proposal for funding , initiated by CIRAD-France, for worldwide comprehensive conservation agriculture. |
|||||||||||||||||||||