![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA's Research
Portfolio
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ICARDA's Research Portfolio>Project2.1>Project2.2>Project2.3>Project2.4>Project2.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICARDA's Research Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Theme
2. Production Systems Management
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Project 2.1. Integrated Pest Management in Cereal- and Legume-Based
Cropping
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Systems
in Dry Areas
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An integrated pest management (IPM) approach is one in which farmers use the most efficient combination of options to protect a crop from insects and diseases. Employing a range of options, such as host-plant resistance, biological control, suitable agronomic practices and habitat management, allows chemical control to be reduced and strictly targeted, benefiting human health and the environment. In 2002, ICARDA identified and released new sources of resistance to lentil vascular wilt, and continued to refine the use of promising, insect-killing fungi isolates as a means of controlling Sunn pest (an insect which attacks barley and wheat crops). A new screening technique was also developed to identify wheat varieties resistant to Sunn pest damage: several promising lines have already been identified. Yellow rust populations in the CAC region were characterized, identifying resistance genes with the potential to be effective throughout the region. Finally, research continued into the integrated management of chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus, barley leaf blotch diseases, Hessian fly in wheat, and ascochyta blight in chickpea |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Integrated pest management in cereal and food legume crops In CWANA, cereal and food
legume production is severely affected by a number of diseases and insect
pests. The most important of these are rusts; leaf blotch diseases (septoria,
tan spot, scald, ascochyta blight, chocolate spot); viral diseases (BYDV,
BNV); seed-borne diseases (smuts, barley stripe); root rot diseases
(fusarium wilts, fusarium head scab); and insect pests (aphids, Hessian
fly, Sunn pest, leaf miner, wheat stem sawfly). Research has focused
on host-plant resistance, and several sources of resistance have been
identified and utilized in the wheat, barley, lentil, faba bean, and
chickpea breeding programs at ICARDA and in the collaborative NARS programs.
The search for new sources of resistance is an important activity undertaken
by the IPM project. Resistant sources, from the ICARDA breeding nurseries
and genebank, are provided to breeding projects annually, by the plant
health group. Monitoring of pest biotypes/pathotypes and changes in
virulence are a major concern, and ICARDA conducts annual surveys in
collaboration with its NARS partners to address this. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New sources of resistance to lentil vascular wilt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vascular wilt
(caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis) is the most widespread
and destructive soil-borne disease of lentil. Complete crop failure
can occur in heavily infested fields when dry, warm weather prevails
late in the cropping season. Efforts to identify new sources of resistance
to this disease are a major aspect of ICARDA's lentil breeding and
pathology program. During the 2002 cropping season, 1500 accessions
from the lentil core collection, and a large number of breeding lines
and wild relatives, were screened against the prevailing Syrian isolate
of F. oxysporum in a sick plot at Tel Hadya, Syria. A total of 34
confirmed and stable sources of resistance, originating from 14 countries,
were identified. Germplasm originating from the Mediterranean region
had a higher incidence of resistant sources, as compared with accessions
originating in countries at lower latitudes. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() A lentil line highly resistant to fusarium wilt (left), developed at ICARDA, compared with a susceptible line (right). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| distributed to different NARS as additional sources of resistance. Two lines (ILL 6994 and ILL 7201) were released under the names 'Idlib 3' and 'Idlib 4' by the Syrian Ministry of Agriculture in 2002, in view of their resistance to wilt and their agronomic performance. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Innovations in Sunn pest control Sunn pest (Eurygaster
integriceps) is a serious pest of wheat and barley in the CWANA
region, and contributes to both yield losses and processing problems.
ICARDA and its partners are working on new Sunn pest control methods,
and in 2002 conducted a number of relevant laboratory and field-based
studies. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Field testing of promising insect-killing fungi Scientists are now testing a promising new biological control method, involving natural enemies of Sunn pest-insect-killing fungi. Laboratory bio-assays of fungi collected from Sunn pest populations across CWANA led to certain isolates being selected for testing in the field. Trials were then conducted to determine the effectiveness of introducing fungi to Sunn pest overwintering sites. Scientists found that significantly greater mortality resulted in plots treated with Beauveria bassiana and a Metarhizium anisopliae than in the controls. A high |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Sunn pest adults killed by naturally occurring fungi. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| percentage
of the dead insects in the treated plots were infected by the fungus with
which it had been treated, strongly suggesting a significant role of fungi
as biological insecticides. Researchers also assessed the persistence of the fungal treatments applied to the overwintering sites. At all sampling periods (the day of treatment, and three, six and nine days after treatment) the fungi were observed to have had a significant effect on Sunn pest. Even after nine days, some of the treatments still showed an effect, indicating that the fungi can persist under dry, hot conditions in the field. Future plans include testing fungi formulated as nutrient-based and non-nutrient-based granulars, and making applications in both the fall and the spring. Field trials were also conducted on wheat to assess the fungi's efficacy against Sunn pest when applied directly to wheat plants-the first trials ever of this kind. Based on mortality alone, no significant effect was observed as a result of the fungal treatments. However, based on an evaluation of the dead insects, researchers demonstrated that infection had occurred, under wheat-field conditions, in the treatment plots. For example, up to 49% of the Sunn pest adults were infected with the B. bassiana fungus. Therefore, a slightly different experimental design is envisioned for next year, so that fungi can be applied more effectively, using an ultra-low-volume sprayer, to tall wheat plants. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bioassays
using fungal isolates from Iran
Using standardized bioassay methods for Sunn pest, both in litter and on plants, researchers tested several fungal strains isolated in 2001 at Iranian overwintering sites. In most cases, Sunn pest mortality was greater when the fungal isolates were applied to litter than directly to plants (Fig. 8). Although the Paecilomyces farinosus isolates were not particularly effective, three of the Iranian B. bassiana isolates tested showed great potential for Sunn pest control. Additional isolates are available for testing in the coming year. This work was carried out in collaboration with the University of Vermont, and was funded by DFID and USAID. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Fig. 8. Mortality of Sunn pest caused by isolates of two species of insect-killing fungus from Iran, when applied to leaf litter and to wheat plants (10 days after application of fungal isolates). *Tween 80 (monooleic acid). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Molecular
characterization of promising fungal isolates
Detailed molecular characterization studies were conducted on promising isolates of Beauveria bassiana to investigate their genetic diversity. These were carried out as part of a DFID-funded IPM project on Sunn pest in West Asia, in collaboration with CABI Bioscience and the University of Vermont. DNA was extracted from a total of 112 isolates (106 of Beauveria bassiana, 5 of other Beauveria species and 1 of Beauveria brongniartii) obtained from surveys of Sunn pest and related insects. Four techniques were used: ISSR-PCR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat PCR), AFLP, restriction analysis of the ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) region, and ITS sequencing. The latter two methods did not detect genetic variation among the B. bassiana isolates. However, results from both the ISSR-PCR and the AFLP analyses clearly indicated genetic diversity among the isolates, and revealed some intraspecific groupings in the various geographical origins (Fig. 9). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Fig. 9. Cluster analysis of AFLP banding patterns obtained from 112 isolates of an insect-killing fungus. Each country of origin was assigned a color: Iran (red), Uzbekistan (blue), Syria (dark green), Turkey (light green), Kazakstan (yellow), Kyrgyzstan (orange), Russia (light pink). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Status of yellow rust in Central Asia and the Caucasus region Yellow rust (caused by Puccinia
striiformis f. sp. tritici) is an important disease of wheat
in most wheat-growing regions, including the Caucasus, West Asia, Central
Asia, the Nile Valley and the Horn of Africa. In East Africa, the Middle
East, China, the Caucasus, and Central and West Asia, yellow rust epidemics
have caused severe wheat crop losses over the past decade. During the
2001/02 season, at least 30-40% yield losses were recorded in major
wheat-producing areas of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and South Kazakstan.
In Uzbekistan, however, over 60% of the country's wheat-producing area
has been protected with fungicides.
The level of resistance that Yr18 alone provides in adult plants may
not be sufficient in environments highly conducive to yellow rust development.
Even so, it may provide useful protection in terms of yield. Leaf tip
necrosis, possibly a linked characteristic, may assist in the selection
of plants possessing this gene. Combining Yr18 with other genes (such
as Yr29 and the components of resistance found in a wheat variety such
as 'Cappelle Deprez') could produce adequate and perhaps durable resistance
in most environments. Integrated management of chickpea stunt in northern Sudan Chickpea stunt, caused by
chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV), is an important disease of chickpea
in central and northern Sudan. In collaboration with the Agriculture
Research Corporation, ICARDA conducted experiments at the Hudeiba Research
Station in northern Sudan during the 1999/00, 2000/01 and 2001/02 growing
seasons. This research evaluated the influence of cultivar type ('Shendi'
and 'ICCV-2'), sowing date (late October, early November and late November)
and irrigation interval on the natural spread of CpCDV in chickpea fields.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table 16. Effect of sowing date and cultivar on chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV) incidence and chickpea yield, Hudeiba, Sudan, during three growing seasons (1999-2002). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Table 17. Effect of irrigation intervals on Chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV) incidence at Hudeiba, Sudan, during the 1999/00 and 2001/02 growing seasons. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RImpact of farmers' practices on barley disease control in Tunisia Barley is cultivated mainly
in the semi-arid regions of Tunisia. In these regions production is
relatively low, and barley leaf blotch diseases cause significant yield
losses. Therefore, ICARDA, in collaboration with Tunisian researchers,
conducted a large-scale investigation, covering 1576 farmers' fields,
to determine the association between disease severity, grain yield and
cultural practices (which included the use of fungicides, fertilizer,
and local and certified seed). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Over all farms surveyed, disease incidence (% of farms infected) was lower for fungicide-treated farms (33%) than for untreated farms (85%). Correspondingly, the mean barley yield for treated farms was higher (270 kg/ha) than the mean for untreated farms (180 kg/ha). Fungicide use also effectively reduced disease severity (measured on a scale of 0-9) in barley fields in the surveyed area (Fig. 10). A leaf-blotch severity of 9 (the maximum possible) was recorded in 25% of untreated fields, while a further 38% of untreated fields showed a disease severity that ranged from 6 to 9. This range was observed in only 2% of the treated fields. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Fig. 10. Frequency of disease-severity scores in Tunisian barley fields, with and without fungicide treatments (0 = resistant; 9 = susceptible). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Also, significant positive associations were found to exist between disease incidence and fertilizer use (both nitrogen and phosphorus), with or without the use of fungicides; however, the associations were stronger in untreated fields (Table 18). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table
18. Correlation coefficients for relationships among grain yield, disease
incidence and fertilizer use for fungicide-treated and untreated barley
fields in Tunisia (data from untreated fields in parentheses).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IPM
in Morocco: testing bread wheat resistant to Hessian fly, and winter vs.
spring sowing of chickpea
Funded by the CGIAR's Systemwide Initiative on IPM, the second year of the IPM Farmer Participatory Training and Research program was completed during the 2001/02 growing season. Each of the program's six sites (located in the Sidi El Aidi, Ain N'Zagh and Jemaa Shaim regions) tested the following IPM options:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Through lead farmers, a number of farmers expressed their willingness
to try some of the options offered last year. These farmers chose a number
of good practices to implement (early seeding, weed control, and the use
of adequate fertilization), as well as the bread wheat varieties resistant
to Hessian fly and the winter chickpea varieties they wanted to grow.
A considerable amount of help was given to them to seed their fields with
the chosen varieties and learn from the experience. To aid in the latter,
several small group meetings (timed to coincide with the seeding of the
early-planting-date cereals and winter chickpea) were held in the field.
Considerable interest was shown in the project, and the planting operations
were themselves attended by a large number of farmers, and not only by
the participating farmers. Many farmers were also present during
the seeding of the late-planting-date cereals. Figure 11 shows the decline in final yield in percent when comparing the different bread wheat treatments (pair by pair). The treatments combined cultivars susceptible or resistant to Hessian fly with early and late sowing dates. At an early sowing date, the susceptible cultivar yielded 14.5% and 30% less than the two resistant cultivars (Fig. 11, treatment comparisons T3/T1 and T3/T2). Late planting of the susceptible cultivar resulted in even greater yield loss (more than 70%), relative to the yields of the early-planted resistant cultivars (comparisons T5/T1 and T5/T2). In both susceptible and resistant cultivars, late sowing dates resulted in lower yields than early sowing dates, although the relative yield loss was smaller in the resistant cultivar than in the susceptible cultivar (comparisons T4/T1 and T5/T3). These results show that the use of cultivars resistant to Hessian fly in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Fig. 11. Wheat grain yield decline among 'treatment ratios,' i.e. pairwise comparisons of yields in different treatments (T1-T5). Each treatment combines a cultivar that is either susceptible ('Marchouch') or resistant ('Aguilal' and 'Arrihane') to Hessian fly, with an early or a late sowing date. Results obtained from the IPM Farmer Participatory Training and Research Program in Morocco. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
conjunction with an early sowing date would, under conditions similar
to those of the experiment, increase final grain yield by more than 70%. Chickpea yield could be significantly improved in theregion by the adoption of winter chickpea technology, in preference to traditional spring planting. Recent trial results support previous findings, and illustrate the gains that can be achieved by using winter chickpea technology (i.e. improved varieties with resistance to ascochyta blight and cold, in conjunction with appropriate cultural practices). Early weed control, using either pre-emergence herbicides or early hoeing and hand weeding, is one of the main components of winter chickpea technology, as it reduces competition for limited water and nutrient supplies. Also, because winter planting of chickpea predisposes the plants to a higher level of infestation by weeds, unless there is adequate weed control, yields can be drastically reduced. The application of a preemergence herbicide resulted in an increase of up to 210% in the yield of winter chickpea (in one site). However, using preemergence herbicide raises some difficulties in terms of cost, timely application, and farmers' habits. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||