ICARDA's Research Portfolio


ICARDA's Research Portfolio

Theme 2. Production Systems Management
  Project 2.1. Integrated Pest Management in Cereal- and Legume-Based Cropping
  Systems in Dry Areas
   
 

An integrated pest management (IPM) approach is one in which farmers use the most efficient combination of options to protect a crop from insects and diseases. Employing a range of options, such as host-plant resistance, biological control, suitable agronomic practices and habitat management, allows chemical control to be reduced and strictly targeted, benefiting human health and the environment. In 2002, ICARDA identified and released new sources of resistance to lentil vascular wilt, and continued to refine the use of promising, insect-killing fungi isolates as a means of controlling Sunn pest (an insect which attacks barley and wheat crops). A new screening technique was also developed to identify wheat varieties resistant to Sunn pest damage: several promising lines have already been identified. Yellow rust populations in the CAC region were characterized, identifying resistance genes with the potential to be effective throughout the region. Finally, research continued into the integrated management of chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus, barley leaf blotch diseases, Hessian fly in wheat, and ascochyta blight in chickpea

Integrated pest management in cereal and food legume crops

In CWANA, cereal and food legume production is severely affected by a number of diseases and insect pests. The most important of these are rusts; leaf blotch diseases (septoria, tan spot, scald, ascochyta blight, chocolate spot); viral diseases (BYDV, BNV); seed-borne diseases (smuts, barley stripe); root rot diseases (fusarium wilts, fusarium head scab); and insect pests (aphids, Hessian fly, Sunn pest, leaf miner, wheat stem sawfly). Research has focused on host-plant resistance, and several sources of resistance have been identified and utilized in the wheat, barley, lentil, faba bean, and chickpea breeding programs at ICARDA and in the collaborative NARS programs. The search for new sources of resistance is an important activity undertaken by the IPM project. Resistant sources, from the ICARDA breeding nurseries and genebank, are provided to breeding projects annually, by the plant health group. Monitoring of pest biotypes/pathotypes and changes in virulence are a major concern, and ICARDA conducts annual surveys in collaboration with its NARS partners to address this.
     The most effective way to maintain a low threshold of major pests and reduce crop losses is to implement an IPM approach. Therefore, biological control agents are being developed, and have shown promise in the control of Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps). IPM options (including selected cultural practices, host resistance, provision of high-quality seed, and limited use of pesticides) have also been successfully used by farmers to control Hessian fly (in Morocco) and chickpea ascochyta blight (in Syria). The following summaries highlight some examples of pest management, and show that pre-emptive control and avoidance of epidemics and subsequent crop losses could be achieved through well-planned and coordinated research, in close collaboration with NARS scientists and farmers.

New sources of resistance to lentil vascular wilt

Vascular wilt (caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis) is the most widespread and destructive soil-borne disease of lentil. Complete crop failure can occur in heavily infested fields when dry, warm weather prevails late in the cropping season. Efforts to identify new sources of resistance to this disease are a major aspect of ICARDA's lentil breeding and pathology program. During the 2002 cropping season, 1500 accessions from the lentil core collection, and a large number of breeding lines and wild relatives, were screened against the prevailing Syrian isolate of F. oxysporum in a sick plot at Tel Hadya, Syria. A total of 34 confirmed and stable sources of resistance, originating from 14 countries, were identified. Germplasm originating from the Mediterranean region had a higher incidence of resistant sources, as compared with accessions originating in countries at lower latitudes.
     Resistant lines confirmed in four generations of the breeding cycle have been included in the Lentil International Fusarium Wilt Nursery, and will be


A lentil line highly resistant to fusarium
wilt (left), developed at ICARDA, compared
with a susceptible line (right).
distributed to different NARS as additional sources of resistance. Two lines (ILL 6994 and ILL 7201) were released under the names 'Idlib 3' and 'Idlib 4' by the Syrian Ministry of Agriculture in 2002, in view of their resistance to wilt and their agronomic performance.

Innovations in Sunn pest control

Sunn pest (Eurygaster integriceps) is a serious pest of wheat and barley in the CWANA region, and contributes to both yield losses and processing problems. ICARDA and its partners are working on new Sunn pest control methods, and in 2002 conducted a number of relevant laboratory and field-based studies.

Field testing of promising insect-killing fungi

Scientists are now testing a promising new biological control method, involving natural enemies of Sunn pest-insect-killing fungi. Laboratory bio-assays of fungi collected from Sunn pest populations across CWANA led to certain isolates being selected for testing in the field. Trials were then conducted to determine the effectiveness of introducing fungi to Sunn pest overwintering sites. Scientists found that significantly greater mortality resulted in plots treated with Beauveria bassiana and a Metarhizium anisopliae than in the controls. A high


Sunn pest adults killed by naturally occurring fungi.
percentage of the dead insects in the treated plots were infected by the fungus with which it had been treated, strongly suggesting a significant role of fungi as biological insecticides.
     Researchers also assessed the persistence of the fungal treatments applied to the overwintering sites. At all sampling periods (the day of treatment, and three, six and nine days after treatment) the fungi were observed to have had a significant effect on Sunn pest. Even after nine days, some of the treatments still showed an effect, indicating that the fungi can persist under dry, hot conditions in the field. Future plans include testing fungi formulated as nutrient-based and non-nutrient-based granulars, and making applications in both the fall and the spring.
     Field trials were also conducted on wheat to assess the fungi's efficacy against Sunn pest when applied directly to wheat plants-the first trials ever of this kind. Based on mortality alone, no significant effect was observed as a result of the fungal treatments. However, based on an evaluation of the dead insects, researchers demonstrated that infection had occurred, under wheat-field conditions, in the treatment plots. For example, up to 49% of the Sunn pest adults were infected with the B. bassiana fungus. Therefore, a slightly different experimental design is envisioned for next year, so that fungi can be applied more effectively, using an ultra-low-volume sprayer, to tall wheat plants.
Bioassays using fungal isolates from Iran

Using standardized bioassay methods for Sunn pest, both in litter and on plants, researchers tested several fungal strains isolated in 2001 at Iranian overwintering sites. In most cases, Sunn pest mortality was greater when the fungal isolates were applied to litter than directly to plants (Fig. 8). Although the Paecilomyces farinosus isolates were not particularly effective, three of the Iranian B. bassiana isolates tested showed great potential for Sunn pest control. Additional isolates are available for testing in the coming year. This work was carried out in collaboration with the University of Vermont, and was funded by DFID and USAID.


Fig. 8. Mortality of Sunn pest caused by isolates of two species of insect-killing fungus from Iran, when applied to leaf litter and to wheat plants (10 days after application of fungal isolates). *Tween 80 (monooleic acid).
Molecular characterization of promising fungal isolates

Detailed molecular characterization studies were conducted on promising isolates of Beauveria bassiana to investigate their genetic diversity. These were carried out as part of a DFID-funded IPM project on Sunn pest in West Asia, in collaboration with CABI Bioscience and the University of Vermont. DNA was extracted from a total of 112 isolates (106 of Beauveria bassiana, 5 of other Beauveria species and 1 of Beauveria brongniartii) obtained from surveys of Sunn pest and related insects. Four techniques were used: ISSR-PCR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat PCR), AFLP, restriction analysis of the ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) region, and ITS sequencing. The latter two methods did not detect genetic variation among the B. bassiana isolates. However, results from both the ISSR-PCR and the AFLP analyses clearly indicated genetic diversity among the isolates, and revealed some intraspecific groupings in the various geographical origins (Fig. 9).

     Click on it

Fig. 9. Cluster analysis of AFLP banding patterns obtained from 112 isolates of an insect-killing fungus. Each country of origin was assigned a color: Iran (red), Uzbekistan (blue), Syria (dark green), Turkey (light green), Kazakstan (yellow), Kyrgyzstan (orange), Russia (light pink).

Status of yellow rust in Central Asia and the Caucasus region

Yellow rust (caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) is an important disease of wheat in most wheat-growing regions, including the Caucasus, West Asia, Central Asia, the Nile Valley and the Horn of Africa. In East Africa, the Middle East, China, the Caucasus, and Central and West Asia, yellow rust epidemics have caused severe wheat crop losses over the past decade. During the 2001/02 season, at least 30-40% yield losses were recorded in major wheat-producing areas of Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, and South Kazakstan. In Uzbekistan, however, over 60% of the country's wheat-producing area has been protected with fungicides.
      Enhanced development and spread of yellow rust in Central Asia and the Caucasus can be attributed to three major factors: (1) environmental effects, (2) the nature of the cultivars employed, and (3) pathogenic evolution.
     An example of the first factor is the yellow rust epidemic observed in Central Asia in 2002, which was exacerbated by extended periods of cool wet spring weather in regions that normally experience a rapid temperature increase during this period. Under such conditions of severe inoculum pressure, cultivar response to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (or Pst) was unexpectedly variable. Other environmental effects, which may also have an impact, include the development of irrigation facilities, and the expansion of wheat cultivation into fertile regions (such as the Fergana Valley in Tajikistan).
     A limited number of cultivars (such as 'Yuna,' 'Steklovidnaya,' 'Spartanka,' 'Sanzar4,' 'Sanzar8,' 'Skifyanka,' and 'Mirbachir') are grown over large areas of the CAC region. These cultivars are highly susceptible to yellow rust, and therefore contribute to the rapid increase of the inoculum. The resultant high disease pressure also causes moderately resistant varieties ('Zhetysu,' and 'Polovchanka') to succumb.
     The final factor underlying change in cultivar disease response is pathogenic evolution. It is possible that, in the CAC region, the evolution of Pst has followed a series of step-wise mutation events, including occasional reversions to virulence (this appears to have occurred in Tajikistan). It is also possible that genetic recombination has occurred in the Pst pathogen, in areas where the rust spores of different pathotypes (races) have been blown in by the wind from different regions (this seems to have occurred in Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan).
     The yellow rust population in the CAC region consists of a number of pathotypes that differ in their pathogenicity toward the host plant. Some (such as 2E0 and 6E0) attack only two resistance genes in the host plant, others (such as 198E150, 230E150) can attack 11 identified genes in the host plants. In collaborative research conducted by ICARDA and NARS in the CAC region, yellow rust populations were characterized using two methods: (1) the Central Western Asia Yellow Rust Trap Nursery (CWAYRTN), planted at yellow rust "hot spots" in Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakstan, and (2) artificial inoculation at experimental stations in Syria, Lebanon and Turkey. By 2003 and 2004, respectively, the Absheron station in Azerbaijan and the selection station in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, will have the capacity to conduct artificial inoculation (allowing proper selection to be made under conditions of disease pressure).
     Analysis of this collaborative research showed that most single resistance genes were defeated in at least one testing site in the Central Asia region, and that gene combinations offered better resistance. Of the 30 resistance genes available, only the following seven remained effective across the whole CAC region:

  • YrSP and YrCV—available in facultative and spring bread wheat;
  • Yr10, Yr3V and Yr3N—available in winter wheat;
  • Yr5 and Yr15—available in wild relatives of wheat (Triticum spp.).

     The level of resistance that Yr18 alone provides in adult plants may not be sufficient in environments highly conducive to yellow rust development. Even so, it may provide useful protection in terms of yield. Leaf tip necrosis, possibly a linked characteristic, may assist in the selection of plants possessing this gene. Combining Yr18 with other genes (such as Yr29 and the components of resistance found in a wheat variety such as 'Cappelle Deprez') could produce adequate and perhaps durable resistance in most environments.
     The germplasm provided by the CIMMYT/ ICARDA wheat program contains a high degree of genetic diversity in terms of race-specific genes that are currently effective in most CWANA countries. Though the diversity of yellow rust's population creates problems, more information is slowly emerging concerning both examples of durable resistance to yellow rust in wheat and the genetic control of such resistance. Evidence suggests that adequate levels of resistance could be obtained using a few additive genes, each having a small to moderate effect. However, improvement is still needed in the application of programs intended to achieve durable resistance to yellow rust in wheat. In the CAC region, surveys of pathogen populations and the genetic characterization of resistance continue to provide information valuable in the design of breeding strategies.

Integrated management of chickpea stunt in northern Sudan

Chickpea stunt, caused by chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV), is an important disease of chickpea in central and northern Sudan. In collaboration with the Agriculture Research Corporation, ICARDA conducted experiments at the Hudeiba Research Station in northern Sudan during the 1999/00, 2000/01 and 2001/02 growing seasons. This research evaluated the influence of cultivar type ('Shendi' and 'ICCV-2'), sowing date (late October, early November and late November) and irrigation interval on the natural spread of CpCDV in chickpea fields.
     Virus incidence was lower in cultivar 'Shendi' than in 'ICCV-2', regardless of the planting date used during the 1999/00 and 2001/02 growing seasons. Delayed sowing reduced CpCDV incidence in both cultivars during all three growing seasons (Table 16). In fact, in one season, virus incidence was 93% in a crop of 'ICCV-2' sown in late October, but only 29% in a crop sown just 28 days later. Short irrigation intervals also reduced virus incidence during the 1999/00 and 2001/02 growing seasons (Table 17). Therefore, the combined effect of partial resistance, delayed planting and irrigation at short intervals proved useful in CpCDV management in chickpea fields in northern Sudan.

Table 16. Effect of sowing date and cultivar on chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV) incidence and chickpea yield, Hudeiba, Sudan, during three growing seasons (1999-2002).
Chickpea cultivar
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Growing
season/Sowing date
'ICCV-2'
Virus
incidence
%
Yield
(kg/ha)
'Shendi'
Virus
incidence
%
Yield
(kg/ha)
1999/00
   
25 October
93.1
177
17
 770
22 November
29.2
721
5
1096
2000/01  

23 October
8.0
 950
na*
na
6 November
5.6
1276
na
na
20 November
0.0
2050
na
na
2001/02    
29 October
28.5
 875
6.1
1190
5 November
18.9
1005
6.2
1275
26 November
 3.4
1116
0.0
2360
* na = data not available.
Table 17. Effect of irrigation intervals on Chickpea chlorotic dwarf virus (CpCDV) incidence at Hudeiba, Sudan, during the 1999/00 and 2001/02 growing seasons.
 
CpCDV incidence (%)
---------------------------------------
 
Growing season
Irrigation interval
Total no. of
irrigations
Chickpea
'ICCV-2'
   cultivar
           'Shendi'

 
1999/00
   
10-day interval
  9
  8.5
0.02
 
20-day interval
  5
39.4
0.90
 
2000/01
7-day interval
11
10.2
1.7
 
14-day interval
  5
27.6
2.8
 
21-day interval
  4
26.8
5.1
 
28-day interval
  3
46.9
9.2

RImpact of farmers' practices on barley disease control in Tunisia

Barley is cultivated mainly in the semi-arid regions of Tunisia. In these regions production is relatively low, and barley leaf blotch diseases cause significant yield losses. Therefore, ICARDA, in collaboration with Tunisian researchers, conducted a large-scale investigation, covering 1576 farmers' fields, to determine the association between disease severity, grain yield and cultural practices (which included the use of fungicides, fertilizer, and local and certified seed).
     Scientists found that the main barley varieties grown in the region were 'Rihane' (76%), 'Manel' (14%) and 'Tej' (5%): local landraces made up only 5% of the total. The predominant blotch diseases were scald (Rhyncosporium secalis) and net blotch (Pyrenopora teres f. teres), covering 87% of the area. Powdery mildew and leaf rust occurred at a lower frequency (28%). Farmers mainly used the fungicides Opus (Epoxyconazole), Tilt (Propiconazole) and Sportak (Prochloraz), and applied nitrogen (ammonium nitrate, 33.5%) and phosphate (Super 45-P2O5, 45%) fertilizers at rates that ranged from 15 kg to 200 kg/ha and 80 kg to 150 kg/ha, respectively.
     Fungicide treatments were applied more on small farms than on larger farms: 58% of farms less than 30 ha in size were treated, yet this figure was less than 15% for farms between 30 ha and 120 ha in size. The existence of a government assistance program, aiming to enhance cereal production by small farmers, explains this use of fungicides on small farms.

     Over all farms surveyed, disease incidence (% of farms infected) was lower for fungicide-treated farms (33%) than for untreated farms (85%). Correspondingly, the mean barley yield for treated farms was higher (270 kg/ha) than the mean for untreated farms (180 kg/ha). Fungicide use also effectively reduced disease severity (measured on a scale of 0-9) in barley fields in the surveyed area (Fig. 10). A leaf-blotch severity of 9 (the maximum possible) was recorded in 25% of untreated fields, while a further 38% of untreated fields showed a disease severity that ranged from 6 to 9. This range was observed in only 2% of the treated fields.

Fig. 10. Frequency of disease-severity scores in Tunisian barley fields, with and without fungicide treatments (0 = resistant; 9 = susceptible).
     Also, significant positive associations were found to exist between disease incidence and fertilizer use (both nitrogen and phosphorus), with or without the use of fungicides; however, the associations were stronger in untreated fields (Table 18).
Table 18. Correlation coefficients for relationships among grain yield, disease incidence and fertilizer use for fungicide-treated and untreated barley fields in Tunisia (data from untreated fields in parentheses).

Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Disease
incidence
Grain
yield
Nitrogen

NA

(0.73**)
0.26
Phosphorous
NA
(0.79**)
-0.66**
Disease incidence
(0.87**)
(0.82**)
-0.89**
Grain yield
(0.94**)
(0.90**)
(-0.87**)
** = statistically significant at the 1% level.
IPM in Morocco: testing bread wheat resistant to Hessian fly, and winter vs. spring sowing of chickpea

Funded by the CGIAR's Systemwide Initiative on IPM, the second year of the IPM Farmer Participatory Training and Research program was completed during the 2001/02 growing season. Each of the program's six sites (located in the Sidi El Aidi, Ain N'Zagh and Jemaa Shaim regions) tested the following IPM options:

  • Two bread wheat varieties ('Aguilal' and 'Arrihane') resistant to Hessian fly, against a susceptible bread wheat ('Marchouch') using an early planting date.
  • One resistant bread wheat variety (either 'Aguilal' or 'Arrihane'), against a susceptible one ('Marchouch') using a late planting date.
  • Winter chickpea (early planting) vs. spring chickpea (late planting)-'Rizki' vs. a local landrace.
     Through lead farmers, a number of farmers expressed their willingness to try some of the options offered last year. These farmers chose a number of good practices to implement (early seeding, weed control, and the use of adequate fertilization), as well as the bread wheat varieties resistant to Hessian fly and the winter chickpea varieties they wanted to grow. A considerable amount of help was given to them to seed their fields with the chosen varieties and learn from the experience. To aid in the latter, several small group meetings (timed to coincide with the seeding of the early-planting-date cereals and winter chickpea) were held in the field. Considerable interest was shown in the project, and the planting operations were themselves attended by a large number of farmers, and not only by the participating farmers. Many farmers were also present during the seeding of the late-planting-date cereals.
     Figure 11 shows the decline in final yield in percent when comparing the different bread wheat treatments (pair by pair). The treatments combined cultivars susceptible or resistant to Hessian fly with early and late sowing dates. At an early sowing date, the susceptible cultivar yielded 14.5% and 30% less than the two resistant cultivars (Fig. 11, treatment comparisons T3/T1 and T3/T2). Late planting of the susceptible cultivar resulted in even greater yield loss (more than 70%), relative to the yields of the early-planted resistant cultivars (comparisons T5/T1 and T5/T2). In both susceptible and resistant cultivars, late sowing dates resulted in lower yields than early sowing dates, although the relative yield loss was smaller in the resistant cultivar than in the susceptible cultivar (comparisons T4/T1 and T5/T3). These results show that the use of cultivars resistant to Hessian fly in


Winter (left) vs. spring-sown chickpea in Morocco.

Click on it


Fig. 11. Wheat grain yield decline among 'treatment ratios,' i.e. pairwise comparisons of yields in different treatments (T1-T5). Each treatment combines a cultivar that is either susceptible ('Marchouch') or resistant ('Aguilal' and 'Arrihane') to Hessian fly, with an early or a late sowing date. Results obtained from the IPM Farmer Participatory Training and Research Program in Morocco.
conjunction with an early sowing date would, under conditions similar to those of the experiment, increase final grain yield by more than 70%.
     Chickpea yield could be significantly improved in theregion by the adoption of winter chickpea technology, in preference to traditional spring planting. Recent trial results support previous findings, and illustrate the gains that can be achieved by using winter chickpea technology (i.e. improved varieties with resistance to ascochyta blight and cold, in conjunction with appropriate cultural practices). Early weed control, using either pre-emergence herbicides or early hoeing and hand weeding, is one of the main components of winter chickpea technology, as it reduces competition for limited water and nutrient supplies. Also, because winter planting of chickpea predisposes the plants to a higher level of infestation by weeds, unless there is adequate weed control, yields can be drastically reduced. The application of a preemergence herbicide resulted in an increase of up to 210% in the yield of winter chickpea (in one site). However, using preemergence herbicide raises some difficulties in terms of cost, timely application, and
farmers' habits.