



The qanat is an intrinsically sustainable technique of groundwater extraction and as such, could provide useful lessons in efficient water management. Consequently, researchers from ICARDA initiated a small pilot project to understand the traditional management systems of qanats. They based their research on the village of Shallaleh Sakhireh, southwest of Aleppo. The community there still relies on an ancient qanat system (Fig. 22), now in a poor state of repair, as the sole source of water for its 25 households.
In the second phase, the
research team interviewed local experts and representatives of government
institutions and documented the geographical, socioeconomic, and hydrological
characteristics of 42 sites in Syria using a map from Lightfoot (1996) as
a reference (Fig. 23). The team identified 91 qanats, of which 30 are still
flowing. They also developed georeferenced databases to record the characteristics
of each qanat. It appears that the Syrian qanats are drying
up and being abandoned as water tables fall due to excessive pumping of groundwater.
Once a qanat dries up, the local people lose interest in agriculture
and drift into other occupations and off-farm employment. Inevitably, with
the abandonmentof
qanats, much of the indigenous knowledge about their management is
also lost.

In this community, as
in many others in West Asia, water and land ownership go together and the
largest landowner is also the largest holder of irrigation rights. Water rights
are measured according to the flow over time from a central collection point
(berka). At present, irrigation rights are divided among 30 people,
but other members of the community are entitled to use the water for other
purposes. In recent years, water flow from the qanat has been declining
due to deposits of silt and stones in the tunnel and parts of the floor have
broken, allowing the water to drain away. The villagers thought that water
flow would increase if the tunnel was cleaned and the floor re-lined. Unfortunately,
they were unable to organize any collective action to maintain the qanat.
Reasons included weak community leadership, inadequate financial resources,
and migration to cities, together with community disputes and a perception
that the transfer of land had led to an unequal distribution of water rights.
The researchers decided that rehabilitation of the qanat would help to restore the communitys social systems as well as their water supply, and sought help from the Syrian General Directorate of Antiquities and Aleppo Museum, as well as bringing in an anthropologist, an economist, and a hydrologist. Meetings with the community led to the development of a plan. The villagers themselves carried out the work and some of them were trained to continue the maintenance work. As a result, water flow increased by 25% in the following winter season, although it is not known if this improvement will be suistainable.
Although many qanats
in Syria have been permanently lost, those still flowing could be renovated
and the local communities are generally willing to do the work. For example,
in Dmeir, 45 km northeast of Damascus, villagers were keen to renovate their
three flowing qanats. Using the experience gained in restoring the
Shallaleh Sakhireh qanat, the team was able to design a renovation
plan for the villagers to implement. They used their experience and the survey
data to define criteria to identify the suitability of other qanats for
rehabilitation. Criteria included the communitys willingness to invest
in future cleaning and renovation, local technical knowledge, the ability
of water users to cooperate, and absence of excessive pumping around qanat
sources.
The qanat project
has important implications beyond the renovation of ancient community water
systems. It highlights how ancient systems can help to identify solutions
to current problems of water management. The project shows how social organization
and institutional mechanisms can be harnessed for effective community action.
Lessons for improved management of qanats may also be applicable to
other traditional systems, such as the wadi (stream) diversion systems
of Yemen and Oman.
The project was funded by the governments of the Netherlands, Germany and Switzerland.
Socioeconomic studies such as the one reported above help scientists understand the different human influences on farming systems.